Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could be proven:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(X, X) → f(a, n__b)
b → a
b → n__b
activate(n__b) → b
activate(X) → X
Q is empty.
↳ QTRS
↳ DependencyPairsProof
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(X, X) → f(a, n__b)
b → a
b → n__b
activate(n__b) → b
activate(X) → X
Q is empty.
Using Dependency Pairs [1,15] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
F(X, X) → F(a, n__b)
ACTIVATE(n__b) → B
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(X, X) → f(a, n__b)
b → a
b → n__b
activate(n__b) → b
activate(X) → X
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
↳ QTRS
↳ DependencyPairsProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
F(X, X) → F(a, n__b)
ACTIVATE(n__b) → B
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(X, X) → f(a, n__b)
b → a
b → n__b
activate(n__b) → b
activate(X) → X
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 0 SCCs with 2 less nodes.